Cultocracy note :
Population control can take many forms , war is a prime example , environmental poisoning leading to deadly disease is another .
I personally agree with the author of the article , there now exists other forms of eugenics , very subtle and very silent . Although they do not appear to be working , for the moment at least .
“Eugenics today is ‘cloaked’, in my opinion, in various technologies consumers really can’t wrap their minds around, I think, because they are ‘dressed up’ as advances in technology.”
Catherine Frompovich – Activist Post
What is eugenics, you may be wondering. There are confused interpretations of that term, especially when it is not recognized for what it originally had been intended to mean, i.e.,
[T]he science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics. Developed largely by Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race, it fell into disfavor only after the perversion of its doctrines by the Nazis. 
Frankly, I really do not accept that meaning which, somehow, seems to be sanitized and even ‘glamorized’, in my opinion. Why do I say that? The reasons are many, especially since eugenics usually has meant the culling of humans and their lives either by clandestine or open-ended means of population reduction, some of which include legal abortion and legal assisted suicide called “euthanasia.”
Euthanasia is illegal in most of the United States. Physician aid in dying (PAD), or assisted suicide, is legal in the states of Washington DC, Pennsylvania, California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, Hawaii, and Washington; its status is disputed in Montana. The key difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide is who administers the lethal dose of medication: Euthanasia entails the physician or another third party administering the medication, whereas in assisted suicide it is the patient’s prerogative to self-administer the medication in order to end their life. 
When state actors, government agencies, technological advances, and/or dictators take it upon themselves to plan and program the snuffing out of life for whatever reason(s), e.g., improving the human gene pool; creating a master race; or ridding the planet of too many “useless eaters”—as is the current thinking of the apparent New World Order as “written in stone” on the Georgia Guidestones, society has to question if the human race has lost our humanity, empathy and real purpose of the meaning of life to do away with over 95% of the current human population. Or, is that too altruistic of a mores to carry forward into the newly-projected world of transhumanism; becoming a human android; or vacillating between any of 31 genders?
Much of the sordid research in eugenics was financially supported by the ‘upper crust of society’, the moneyed-men of technological advances, as in :
The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, such as the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration, to seek out Jewish, Italian and other immigrants in New York and other crowded cities and subject them to deportation, trumped up confinement or forced sterilization.
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. [….]
The superior species the eugenics movement sought was populated not merely by tall, strong, talented people. Eugenicists craved blond, blue-eyed Nordic types. This group alone, they believed, was fit to inherit the earth. In the process, the movement intended to subtract emancipated Negroes, immigrant Asian laborers, Indians, Hispanics, East Europeans, Jews, dark-haired hill folk, poor people, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the gentrified genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists.
Even the United States Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” This decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman. Years later, the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials quoted Holmes’s words in their own defense.  [CJF emphasis]
[That SCOTUS decision is known as Buck v. Bell, 274U.S. 200 (1927), which sort of ‘affirmed’ the Jacobson 1905 decision, while still impacting the current politics, policies and mandates regarding vaccines/vaccinations today in the USA!]
Other titans of politics, business and industry were also into eugenics, which included Helen Keller, Theodore Roosevelt, Sir Winston Churchill, Linus Pauling, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., John Maynard Keynes, Edward Franklin Frazier, William Edward Burghardt Du Bois, Woodward Wilson and Clarence Darrow . So were H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Francis Crick, and Alexander Graham Bell .
Can there be clandestine eugenics going on no one would consider, except when one digs into the dirty underside of the sciences and technology involved, one has to wonder what role they play in what’s called “soft kill.”
Read the full article here at Activist Post
Further reading :