Motives for Mind Control : Part I

Allen Barker, June 13, 2001

This essay is the first in a series of three on mind control.  It discusses some of the motives for mind control and why it continues.  Part II of the series, “Resisting the Mind Control State,” describes some methods to protest and resist mind control abuses and atrocities.  Part III, “Mental Firewalls,” discusses some of the techniques victims have developed to survive the ongoing torture operations.

For the purposes of this essay, mind control refers to any method used nonconsensually on a victim to covertly and deniably attempt to control or modify that person’s behavior.  This occurs in settings where a person has a reasonable expectation not to be violated, such as in his or her home or in his or her private mentation.  It is this sort of violation that differentiates a mind control crime from an ordinary social interaction, just as the lack of consent turns sex into rape.

Consider “street theater” as an example.  Street theater refers to a form of harassment where a group of torturers act out little skits, either literally on the street or on the internet, in the media, etc., intended to harass and disturb an individual or to otherwise modify the victim’s behavior.  So if a group of people act out “street theater” to a random person to disturb him or her then, while this might be a crime, I would not necessarily call it mind control.  It is when surveillance is combined with the “skits” to both track a person over time for harassment and to obtain personal information about a person to be used in the harassment that I would say a mind control operation is being carried out.

Of course there are many sorts of mind control operations, but they all tend to have this sort of feedback setup: violate a person with extreme surveillance and use that surveillance information to target the influencing.  It is a classic sort of feedback setup that might be described in terms of the mathematical and engineering fields of control theory, at least in the abstract sense.  The surveillance devices can range from phone taps, audio and video bugs in a home or car, internet monitoring, and basic tracking devices, all the way up to advanced satellite surveillance methods, super-sensitive electromagnetic sensor systems with computer analysis, and devices implanted in people’s bodies without their consent.  The “effector” or the control variables can range from harassing phone calls, street theater, rumor spreading, power-line dimming, and internet messages all the way up to harassment with microwave devices, acoustic weapons, messages in the media such as TV and newspapers, projecting “voices” to a person that only he or she can hear, and direct brain stimulation and manipulation.

Other mind control methods use techniques such as hypnosis and drugs to influence people, but the methods all have the common thread of the denied and deniable attack against the mind of an individual.  The purpose of this essay is not to specifically describe the methods of mind control.  More specifics will be given in the later essays of this series, and one can consult books and articles by various authors for the documented history of mind control technology and operations in the U.S.  See, for example, the articles at the Mind Control: Technology, Techniques, and Politics web site at

Even if you do not believe that all of this is currently happening — though it is — you should still be concerned.  Based on public, open sources it is clear to almost anyone that the technology will be available in the near future.  But there are victims now.  You do not even have to think the U.S. government is doing this, but it is.  “Our boys” will be targeted with these sorts of weapons in future wars.

For the purposes of this essay, I assume that the reader has a general grasp of the type of mind control manipulations being discussed and I consider possible motivations a harasser, monitor, or controller (or group thereof) might have to commit such vicious crimes.  Because this essay is intended to get people thinking, the possible motives will not necessarily be linked to any particular technological method, but the reader with some common sense will see what methods might be used in each case and will no doubt be able to think of combinations and motivations not directly mentioned here.

To spoil the rest of the essay, the reasons boil down to money and power.

Technological Equivalent of the Atomic Bomb

Many items appear on the list of motivations for mind control abuses, but the one primary reason why the technology was developed is because it is a weapon.  This is the first motivation and why billions of dollars have been covertly spent on the technology.  Of course, once the technology and techniques are developed they tend to proliferate.  Other application tend to be found, depending on the level of corruption in a society, and organized crime groups other than the government tend to obtain such weapons and techniques.  But the primary reason such devices were first developed and tested is that governments were and are developing and testing weapons.

A recent Air Force Times article about a microwave crowd control weapon being prepared for deployment described such weapons as “perhaps the biggest breakthrough in weapons technology since the atomic bomb,” and the particular weapon they were describing is far, far from the covert cutting edge.  Indeed, a government would be negligent if it did not investigate such technology.  But using the technology on people without their consent, either in testing or in applications, is either an act of war if committed on foreign individuals or an act of treason if committed on domestic citizens.  It is almost always an act of torture.

It is important not to confuse the real motivation with the rationalizations or the cover reasons.  Terrorists, terrorists, terrorists, and pedophiles are the currently popular rationalizations for usurping citizens’ inalienable liberties now that the cold war is over.  A week of American TV would convince any unindoctrinated viewer of that.  There is also the phenomenon I call “spreading the blood around.”  This is the idea that the more people who can be made to take part in some way in a large-scale atrocity — to get some of the blood on their hands — the more political support that can be generated for continuing the atrocities.

Some differences between the atomic bomb and mind control technology need to be pointed out.  First, mind control technology is meant to be used covertly and deniably.  It is not meant necessarily to kill, though it can, but rather to ultimately control a human being like an automaton.  Secondly, mind control technology is designed for use against the domestic population, rather than just against foreign targets.

Who Would Want to Rule the World?

At some level it is stunning that an essay such as this is necessary at all.  People have always

wanted to “control men’s minds” — not to mention women’s minds.  But people historically have also been manipulated again and again, by one group of people followed by another, by one big lie followed by another — often convinced that it cannot possibly be happening now.  There is also a “moral big lie” where decent people cannot imagine that anyone could have the capacity to carry out such heinous atrocities and conspiracies over long periods of time, because they could not imagine themselves doing it.  They have minor moral lapses like everyone (like ordinary people tell small lies) but they just cannot grasp the notion of the big moral atrocity because they would never consider such abominations.

There always have been and always will be people among us who yearn for nothing but to be tyrants over other people.  Let us be clear here on that point and never forget it.  There will always be someone who wants to be the next Stalin — to choose one historical example from countlessly many — and who will stop at absolutely nothing to achieve this.  This also means that there are Americans among us now who are just this sort of person — or a lackey for such a person — living among us in our society.  Do not let the big lie and ubiquitous American propaganda fuzzy your thinking.  The threat is more likely to come from within the government than from someone’s garage.  Eternal vigilance is indeed the price of liberty.

Motives for Mind Control

We finally come to the list of possible motivations for mind control.  It is important to remember, though, that it is not the responsibility of the torture victim to second-guess the reasons the torture was committed.  In this sense the “reason” for the torture is generally that the torturer had the opportunity to commit the torture and thought he or she could get away with it.  Nonetheless, it is useful to examine more mercenary or mercantile sorts of possible motivations to better see why mind control torture is happening, why it continues, and maybe gain some insight into how it can be abolished.

Remember that in any group of people there is politics.  This is also the case with the people involved in the conspiracy of mind controllers.  So when considering questions such as “why don’t they just kill everyone who speaks out at all” or other such questions — which can be useful to consider even if you cannot know the exact answer — it is important to keep this in mind.  Mind control conspirators tend to come from the same culture and live in the same society with the victims.  When they leave the underground bunker — literally or metaphorically — they go to live in homes and with families among us.  [The low-level mind controllers, like Auschwitz guards, probably do not know the whole mind control system either.  Also, with advanced electronic sorts of harassment the harasser could be half a world away with a good connection, but presumably still lives in a community among some decent people.]

Many interrelated motives are mentioned on the following list, but that does not imply that exactly one listed motive is the true motive in any case, or that the list is exhaustive.  A useful comparison for how a victim might be used is a comparison to a slaughterhouse, where an animal comes in and is cut up and almost every usable scrap that can be used for anything is used.  To use a slave auction analogy, if one slaver has a slave that is good for X but needs Y, and another slaver has a slave that is good for Y and wants X, then perhaps they can strike up a commercial transaction on their human chattel.

Some might object that publicizing this list will only give new ideas to harassers.  It might, but the only alternative is to keep the people uninformed and to allow the atrocities to continue.  I also suspect that the people with access to this technology for some years have already thought of (and applied) all of these reasons, even if they did not express them this way.

Here is the list of motives, in no particular order.

Low-intensity warfare against the domestic population.  This has long been the policy of the U.S. government, though it typically is not so directly stated.  Cointelpro actions are covertly undertaken to harass and discredit people who, for whatever reason, are “in the way.”  Frank Donner, in his 1980 book Age of Surveillance, makes this point with example after example.  In his phrase, convert surveillance and harassment has become an unspoken “mode of governance” in the U.S.  So this newer technology simply fits right in as a more high-tech way to continue carrying out this “mode of governance.”  A key concept which Donner points out, and which many Americans cannot quite seem to grasp is that the government does not need to accuse you of a crime or charge you or try you if they can just punish you.  A paranoid government does not even need to suspect that you are committing any crime, wrongdoing, or organizing at all: only that you might do so.  These sorts of programs usually tend to target potential leaders and whistleblowers, though anyone can be cointelproed.

Would such a program, if “successful,” be contained and only be used on foreign scientists?  I do not think so.  It would be used on any people at all, only limited by the cost and the perceived risk of being caught.  Domestic targets might even be more tempting because the risk of discovery could be better “managed.”  You would not even have to be a brilliant scientist, some bureaucrat only needs to think you are, or that you are somehow “of interest.”  If enough people are targeted then almost all levels of scientists and engineers could be targeted.  (If they had a golden goose they’d dissect it.)

Intellectual property theft from scientists and engineers is only listed first because of the slippery slope example above; there are many classes of people who might be targeted for similar reasons.  Einstein is quoted as having said that imagination is more important than intelligence, and imagination is even more important to covert organizations who effectively select against employees with real imagination.

Other sorts of creative people who might be vulnerable are writers (plagiarism), other types of artists or craftspeople, inventors, programmers, etc.  In an economic espionage sense, any sort of innovative or high-volume stock trader or business leader might be a tempting and very lucrative target.  Dialogue and situations stolen from people’s real lives can become tomorrow’s “drama.”  Patents, copyrights, trademarks, and any sort of intellectual property can be deniably stolen from these victims.  This can deny them their livelihoods and makes them literal slaves.

Statistical profiling of a population.  This is like using nonconsensual subjects in a focus group, to understand what their likes, dislikes, needs, and trends are.  It might be most effective with unwitting subjects (who have not realized they are under monitoring), but can still be used on subjects who know they are being monitored.  It is like having the ability to take an instant poll of a captive population, who may not even be able to hide what their innermost secrets are.  Anyone who knows anything about modern U.S. elections knows how influential and widely used polls are.  This is just one aspect of the power of being able to statistically profile a large population.  It is the statistics of population control, where some sample of people — which does not even need to be especially large relative to the hundreds of millions in the population — can be used to predict trends in the larger population.

Suppose, for example, that an individual were put under surveillance and found useful to serve as an exemplar of a statistical demographic group, say of 100,000 people.  That is, that person’s perspective, ideas, and reactions could be used to both predict and manipulate the entire social group on a large scale.  This sort of analysis is already known to take place; it becomes that much more effective with a focus group under even more invasive monitoring.  In a commercial sense, the power to manipulate a demographic group is the power to get them to purchase goods and provide a profit.  Every sort of thing is marketed these days.  Advertising campaigns are created to sell politicians, soap, ideas, slurs, and anything else.

Interrogation for secrets.  This is another advanced technology application to old-fashioned spying.  People can be “brain interrogated” for secrets they know.  This may be used to reveal critical passwords, uncover blackmailable incidents, and obtain national and commercial secrets.

Psyop BDA.  BDA is the military abbreviation for bomb damage assessment.  In order to most effectively bomb a target you need to know which bombs hit their target and how much damage was inflicted by the bombing.  This feedback is then used to both improve the subsequent bombings and to revisit targets that were missed.  One of Noam Chomsky’s main theses has for years been that “democratic” governments use propaganda similarly to the way direct totalitarian governments use violence.  Therefore, it is important for the cloistered elites to know how well their propaganda “bombs” are playing with the masses.  Like with the statistical profiling use of “maximally invasive surveillance,” nonconsensual monitoring can provide this sort of political control feedback data.

Entertainment freak show.  Sadism and voyeurism are powerful motivations for some people.  Mind control victims can provide a live torture-cam of an individual 24 hours a day, and may even allow the sadist to play at the controls and inflict damage or influence the “show.”  It would be like an ongoing snuff film you could participate in.  This may also be a part of “spreading the blood around” by appealing to some of the baser human instincts and then having a person on the hook for having participated (like has been alleged for some “satanic” rituals where people take a small part in a ritual crime so they are inextricably linked to the conspiracy).

To suppress technology they cannot control.  Many people believe that you can always be the best if you can harass and put down anyone better.  This seems to be the modus operandi of the U.S. secret sector, where if they do not control the technology then it is stolen, the original inventor or developer (or just student) is harassed, and it can then be developed in secret.  Even if they are not themselves interested in the new technology, the temptation to suppress any possible disruption to the status quo is always there.  There is a law in Washington that there can be no building taller than the Capitol.  When secrecy-bred mediocrity and lack of accountability are taken into account the Capitol becomes a very low building.

Hired harassment squad for billionaires.  It does not take long for some personnel involved in this technology and experienced with these techniques to leave for the private sector.  This opens the possibility for deniable mercenary harassment squads.

Distributed concentration camps.  The federal government has historically made plans for “emergencies” which have included lists of people to lock up in internment camps.  With this new technology perfected, the concentration camps can be “distributed,” by turning each listed person’s home and mind into an electronic prison.

Vigilante groups.  To control “crime,” or whatever they choose to claim they are targeting people for, a vigilante group can select people they do not like for extrajudicial punishment.  Like most such groups, actually “controlling crime” is just an excuse to pick people for victimization and to rationalize it to the members of the group.

To control a person, like a world leader or assassin (or any sort of leader).  This is probably the ultimate dream of a mind controller (or their own controllers): to take control of a world leader or other important person.  This could even start from a young age, with the person groomed for the position of power and with members of the secret team influencing and increasing the opportunities for the chosen “asset” to reach a position of power.  When trained from a young age an unfortunate child might not even realize that the influencing was not normal (the “secret friend” that is not imaginary).  Subtle advanced techniques could influence an adult without his or her knowledge.  Even if he or she suspected, there would likely already be a pool of blackmail information and powerful psychological levers to employ against the person.

The quest for controlled assassins, or Manchurian candidates, is well-known.  The search for such techniques never stopped and is still ongoing.  Similarly, sexual blackmail operations are an ongoing reality and mind control victims may be utilized in setting up such traps.

If the technology is cheap enough or if you have a wide-field multi-target device you do not even need to target the leaders.  Your army can covertly “capture” more and more of the inhabitants (or flick a switch on a wide-field device) until it can march into town down main street to a hero’s welcome.  Then again, once this is accomplished there is no need to march in at all, just keep milking out “tribute” from the conquered people — who never even knew there was a war against them.  It is easy to parody this as just some sort of “body snatchers” scenario, but to military planners it is a very real thing.

To infiltrate a group.  In order to control, influence, or install a puppet leader in a group the controllers do not know much about and really do not understand, it could be useful to monitor a member or leader in order to learn what might be effective responses, ideas, or actions.  For example, a religious sect they wanted to control.  Another example would be for a mind controller to use information gained from the monitoring of a victim in order to better pose as a victim, say on the internet.

Genocide.  This could be the implicit or explicit result of a mind control operation.  The group here is whatever group is selected for torture, which may be racial, religious, socioeconomic, or related to whatever other selection criteria is used.  People under long-running extrajudicial torture are not free to just “choose life” even if they wanted to.  People are forced to decide whether they should bring a child into the world to also be monitored and violated every day, without the child’s or the parent’s consent.  They have to wonder about supporting a child when they are under ongoing torture which may intensify at any moment.  They know that, at the least, the life of any child will be threatened in order to further torture them and harass them, and they know that the threat is credible.

As a medical scam for money.  These days medicine and pharmaceuticals represent big money.  If the cover lie for mind control abuses is mental illness them some mind control victims will be misdiagnosed as mentally ill (rather than as torture victims) and given (or even forced) treatment and medication.  An unscrupulous company or group of individuals could exploit this fact to make money off the suffering of the mind control victims.

To predict and preempt actions.  Besides wanting to just control behavior, a running trend is to want to predict behavior, obviously before it happens.  But the sort of data that is needed to predict behavior in detail is exactly the same as the invasive surveillance data used to control and harass individuals.  Prediction is also a component in more effective control.

We are already seeing instances where people’s rights are infringed upon not because they have done anything but because someone predicted they would do something, based upon whatever methodology.  Much of this prediction is just snake oil and pseudoscience, but that does not change the fact that the rights infringement is very real.  There is also a statistical and scientific methodology to prediction which undoubtedly will improve with time.  If you can accurately predict someone’s actions you can move to preempt those actions even before they are taken.

To train agents to perform any of these actions.  As professional torturing scum either retire, move into other sectors, or quit in disgust, new agents must be hired to take their places.  If the system is expanding then new people need to be hired to enlarge the system (or to automate the system with computers so fewer monitors can control more and more people).  These people need to be trained in the special juvenile and idiotic barbarity the U.S. mind controllers love to inflict.  Therefore fresh victims must continually be selected from the population so these sadistic pigs can practice their torture techniques.

To intimidate a population by making “examples” of people. If it were an open secret that people can be selected for any reason for mind control torture, then the population in on the open secret would be intimidated, if not terrified, that any one of them could be the next victim.  This is just a new method of violence by which a regime of thugs can control a population using a long-practiced terror tactic.

To perfect the technology and techniques and make it less detectable. This is the human guinea pig testing of the weapons technology, much like radiation tests on unwitting citizens.  Weapons are built, human subjects are chosen from the population, and the weapons are tested on the nonconsensual subjects.  (Some consensual subjects are no doubt also used, but that is not a human rights violation if the consent was truly informed.)  After these tests, the weapons lab analyzes the terrorized or influenced or manipulated responses of the subjects (in a “successful” test) and refines the weapon system.

A part of this testing also serves to help close all avenues of response and redress which might be open to the human subjects (and which later domestic targets of the weapon might have).  Any response the victim tries to make is monitored, and if it might be successful then this “loophole” in the system of denying justice is closed.  For example, a lawyer might be used to attempt to see what legal strategies he or she might think of so they could be rendered ineffective.  A technical person would be observed as he or she tried to understand, measure, and block the effects of the weapons system.  This would be valuable feedback to the designers, and might even provide them with ideas.  Note that for this particular aspect of the torture it is important that the victim know he or she is being attacked/violated.

Of course a victim has little choice but to try to resist or else to willingly become a slave (which still would not likely stop the harassment).  He or she must constantly think about the “testing” because it is typically ongoing, day and night.  That is just the vicious catch 22 that victims must deal with and is a part of why it is torture.  I am not trying to discourage any victim from taking whatever action they decide is the best course in such a horrible situation.

Various unwitting spy scenarios.  Perhaps the best spy is one who does not even know he or she is a spy.  He or she cannot reveal it even under the most extreme torture because he or she does not know it.  Such people can be infiltrated into any group or just selected out of any particular group and “wired up.”  In a domestic social sense, inmates in prisons can be wired up before they are released so their monitors can peep into any criminal underworld activity which they might enter into after being “freed.”  (Of course it is important not to confuse the secret police with the regular police and law enforcement, though there is certainly overlap.)

To steal negotiating strategies or information.  Arms control, treaties, business negotiations.

To conceal scientific and philosophical insights into human existence.  One of the things repressive societies fear is new ideas and new ways of thinking.  Scientific advances have been made which could revolutionize the ways man views himself (to use the masculine form); but for some people this represents a potential threat to their power.  The new technologies could also potentially help our aging relatives, for example, if used in a humane and consensual way.  But it is a difficult philosophical shift to acknowledge that now our own “silent” thoughts might not be private — or might not really be our own.  This is one of the difficulties in getting people to understand mind control crimes.  (Remember also that mind controllers have no compunction or restriction against using any lies or deceptions or defiling and desecrating any religion in an attempt to manipulate people.)

Human guinea pigs for medical or psychological research.  Once people are under ongoing, invasive surveillance they can become guinea pigs for any sort of medical or psychological human testing that needs continued monitoring.  This is a lucrative business now.  For example, if a person were were “knocked out” one day by whatever method and had a patch of skin rubbed with some chemical under development or of concern then the experimenters could watch the person’s own response to the potential poisoning.  Psychological research has even larger potential for abuse.  Real “field testing.”

To maintain the ongoing mind control conspiracy.  Because atrocities have been committed, atrocities continue to be committed to conceal them.  The mind control technology and harassment network is used to keep the secret system secret, punish whistleblowers, and of course increase profits at whatever cost to human dignity.


Given that there is a long list of possible motives, hundreds of people (at the least) claiming to be victims of exactly this sort of technology, the known development of the technology, a history of such abuses, and the continued coverups of acknowledged MKULTRA and other mind control victims in the population, it seems reasonable to conclude that nonconsensual testing and harassment is still going on with the latest technology.  The questions are, who are the victims, how many are there, what was and is being done to them, and how can this extrajudicial torture of the domestic population be stopped as soon as possible.

Part I – Motives for Mind Control | Part II – Resisting the Mind Control State | Part III – Mental Firewalls

Posted in Mind Control, State Surveillance & Control, Targeted Individuals, Uncategorized | 1 Comment


By Giza Death star

One of the things I’ve commented on from time to time, is the uncanny way that patterns emerge in the articles that people share with me. Most readers here are aware that this website’s community contributes an enormous amount of articles via emails, and when I review them, I try to allow the readership here to determine what I blog about. I make the selections of course, but every now and then, so many articles are sent that are more or less focussed on particular themes or topics, that I try to blog about those patterns when they occur.

This week, there was a heavy interest – maybe it’s in the aether – on the subject of the technologies and techniques of mind manipulation and even of weaponizing such technologies. Consider these two articles, the first, shared by Ms. M.W., and the second by Mr.V.T.:

Using Brain Electrodes Researchers Were Able To Read Minds Almost At The Speed Of Thought

Putin targets foes with ‘zombie’ gun which attack victims’ central nervous system

Now, concerning the first article, some weeks ago I blogged about Japanese neurological researchers who had successfully demonstrated a system that was able to read a person’s thoughts remotely, i.e., via a super-sensitive receiver that tuned into a person’s brain waves, and then translated these via computer algorithms. Note that the technology discussed in the first article is the use of implanted electrodes in the brain, but note also the vast expansion of possibilities this makes available:

The team implanted the electrodes into the brains of epilepsy patients at the Seattle Harborview Medical Center. These patients were chosen because usual treatments, like medication, weren’t effective. It was necessary for the researchers to use this procedure temporarily to see if they could find the focal points of the seizures.

With their specialized test of showing images of faces and houses to the patients, the researchers were able to determine in a much broader scale, the affected neurons instead of one neuron in traditional diagnostics. This allowed for an algorithm that analyzed the data to determine on its own what the patient was looking at, whether it was a picture of a house, a face, or a blank screen and to their surprise, the algorithm ascertained the right answer at 96% of the time. It did it at an average speed of 20 milliseconds.

Things get weirder with this area of research. In another experiment researchers were able to get disabled persons to move a finger where they couldn’t do before and they hooked up two brains with electrodes so that the two people could guess what the other was thinking.

This is straight out of science fiction for sure but it’s a reality now.

In theory the use of electrodes of a more complex level could achieve ways for disabled persons to regain lost abilities of mobility and communication.

It does not take much imagination to see endless other possibilities, such as “radio assisted telepathy,” i.e., the direct communication of thoughts between soldiers on the battlefield, without the use of speech. Throw in encryption technologies (think of the current dispute between Apple and the US Federal government here, over the phone of the San Bernardino terrorists), and one has not only a vast potential for “interaction”, but also for a new type of privacy in communications. Then throw in hacking, signals jamming and… well, you get the idea.

But the technology also implies something else, raised by the second article:

Sources in Moscow say Mr Putin has described the guns, which use electromagnetic radiation like that found in microwave ovens, as ‘entirely new instruments for achieving political and strategic goals’.

Mr Putin added: ‘Such high-tech weapons systems will be comparable in effect to nuclear weapons, but will be more acceptable in terms of political and military ideology.’

Plans to introduce the super- weapons were announced quietly last week by Russian defence minister Anatoly Serdyukov, fulfilling  a little-noticed election campaign pledge by president-elect Putin.

Mr Serdyukov said: ‘The development  of weaponry based on new physics principles – direct-energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, genetic weapons, psychotronic weapons, and so on – is part  of the state arms procurement programme for 2011-2020.’

Specific proposals on developing the weapons are due to be drawn  up before December by a new Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Research into electromagnetic weapons has been secretly carried out in the US and Russia since the Fifties. But now it appears Mr Putin has stolen a march on the Americans. Precise details of the Russian gun have not been revealed. However, previous research has shown that low-frequency waves or beams can affect brain cells, alter psychological states and make it possible to transmit suggestions and commands directly into someone’s thought processes.

Note that the “psychotronic” weapons are but one component of a whole list of weapons Russia will be adding to its arsenal: directed energy, geophysical, wave-energy(think Dr. Evgenny Podkletnov!?), genetic weapons, and of course, the mind-manipulation weapons, which, in this list, and given the types of capabilities that have been demonstrated in neurological research in recent months, are no longer the stuff of science fiction. And with the development of such technologies will come the inevitable development of countermeasures.
Stop and ponder this for a moment: the arms races of the 20th century, from the dreadnought to the strategic bomber to nuclear and thermonuclear weapons, will now give way to the arms race to control and manipulate the mind itself. One can imagine all the usual offshoots: tactical weapons, i.e., psychotronic “pistols” and “rifles” for use against specific individual targets, to theater and strategic psychotronic “howitzers” able to influence whole regions and their populations. (One can only hope that they’ll be able to beam some sense into Washington, Wall Street, Berlin, and the City of London.)
But what I find most interesting about this is the tacit admission contained in the second article. For years, beginning in the 1980s, former Lt. Col.(US Army, ret.) Tom Bearden began to write and warn precisely about the Russian research and development of a series of weapons he called “scalar” or “quantum potential” weapons, weapons that could alter the physical state of matter, drain energy from, or put energy into, various regions, and, yes, alter the mental and emotional state of individuals and populations. These, Bearden maintained, were all based on the same basic principles, i.e., there was an underlying and basic physical principle which could be tapped and tweated and adjusted to accomplish a variety of things, depending on the situation and the desired goal, including mind manipulation, and even disease induction or cure. Bearden was, of course, largely scoffed at. It sounded magical, unbelievable.
But Mr. Serdyukov has now seemingly confirmed the existence, at least as far as the Russians are concerned, of “new physics principles,” which sounds suspicious like what Bearden was warning about decades ago. In short, it’s now public, and the Russians plan on spending some money on the technologies.
Now for the high octane speculation. Over the past few months, I’ve been suggesting in various blogs and interviews, that Russia is, in a sense, the first post-post modern state, since shedding the avowed atheism and secularism of the Soviet era. Russia, as I and others have noted, has been challenging the dogma of the West’s globalists – I occassionally refer to it as globaloney – namely, that the era of the nation-state is over, and that the world should be run by transnational corporations and banks ala the encyclicals of David Rockefailure. The new sovereignty is the transnational corporation. So what has this to do with psychotronic weapons? A great deal, it turns out, for if the new sovereignty is the transnational corporation, then it becomes possible, according to the Russian logic, to declare war on them. But how would one target such an entity? Precisely by such weapons. In this context it’s worth remembering the Soviet-era “microwaving” of the US embassy in Moscow, a hazardous place to work, since the incidence of cancers of embassy employees was abnormally high. Now imagine parking your pyschotronic weapon truck outside, say, Mon(ster)santo’s headquarters in St. Louis, Misery, and beaming “disease” waves or mental and emotional states… You get the idea. It’s a covert way to wage war, par excellence, and the Russians appear to be willing to expand their arsenal to be able to wage it.
The psychotronic arms race may have just begun…
See you on the flip side…


Cultocracy note :
This technology is forging a new arms race , shadow government elements are currently vying for supremacy . Billions in cash has been poured into psychotronic research for several decades , guinea pigs are needed as test subjects , no individual is safe from the groups who currently possess the technology . The new arms race is now entering a phase where experimentation is being carried out en masse in towns & cities , the insanity of the groups involved knows no bounds , everyone is considered the enemy . A new frontier is currently at the head of the new arms race where psychotronics are being coupled with super computer powered A.I. , even private corporations are now trying to get a foothold on the race to develop the technology .
Profile photo of Joseph P. Farrell
Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.
Related :
  1. Satellite Harrassment Technology – This is INSANITY.
  2. Whistleblower reveals military mind control project at major university
  3. Brain computer interfacing: a big step towards military mind-control
  4. Artificial Intelligence – Sythetic Telepathy
  5. Synthetic Telepathy – The Article Wikipedia Did Not Want You To Read
  6. Mark Zuckerberg’s vision of the future is full of artificial intelligence, telepathy, and virtual reality
  7. “It’s The Ultimate Weapon”
  8. Synthetic Telepathy – The Hidden Truth
Posted in Psychotronic Warfare, State Surveillance & Control | Leave a comment

David Cameron is blamed for the rise of I$I$


Just another puppet

Read more :

  1. David Cameron ‘ultimately responsible’ for Libya
  2. WOW! David Cameron Blames President Assad For The Rise Of ISIS
  3. Barack Obama Blames David Cameron For Libya Descending Into A ‘Shit Show’
  4. Cameron fears ISIS terror attacks in UK


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

US: Torture Without Borders

Author: Janet Phelan

An attorney with the State of California reports being gassed inside her home and taken to a hospital Emergency Room, following repeated incidents of electromagnetic attacks. The attacks take place during an extended court battle over her mother’s guardianship.

An anti-police corruption activist in Medford Oregon reports an aerosol attack on her dwelling which causes her to lose consciousness.

An award winning author pens a memoir concerning how the NSA tried to hack into her mind.

A former intelligence officer lines her apartment with boom boxes in order to drown out chatter of electronic voice weapons. She reports that her mission was successful and the voices have stopped.

Are these women crazy or is the US government now testing its weapons on selected civilians?

Bruised by the Iraqi war, the revelations that the US government was involved in torturing detainees hit fast and hard. What were initially some horrific photos leaked from Abu Ghraib soon become a virtual flood of accusations. Prisoners, it appeared, were being tortured by simulated drowning; their genitals electro shocked and the uncooperative were put into tiny spaces and deprived of sensory input.

In his campaign promises of 08, President Obama assured us that torture would cease and that Guantanamo would be closed. However, it is nearly eight years since Obama took office, and the prison at Guantanamo has not closed, nor have renditions to countries agreeable to torture ceased. In 2015,Al Jazeera reported that “More positively for his legacy, the NDAA imposes further restrictions on abusive interrogations and helps fulfill his (President Obama’s) original campaign promise to stop torture.”

A number of individuals with intelligence backgrounds would disagree. In fact, it appears that, as far as torture goes, some are now asserting that the intelligence agencies are using US citizens for target practice.

Electromagnetic Weapons

In former intelligence officer Julianne McKinney’s seminal 1992 report, entitled Microwave Harassment and Mind Control, she revealed for the first time a disturbing blip on the intel radar. Citing contacts with people across the US, McKinney details what amounts to covert programs to torture people through use of electronic weapons. And to do so in the targets’ (TI’s) own homes and wherever they may travel.

McKinney’s groundbreaking report cited about 25 individuals who claimed that they were being electronically harassed. It is now twenty five years later and this number has ballooned to hundreds of thousands, worldwide.

According to Wikipedia, “Electronic harassment, or psychotronic torture, or electromagnetic torture is a conspiracy theory.” Wikipedia goes on to determine that “These experiences are hallucinations or the result of delusional disorders or psychosis.”

Certainly some of the claims of TIs sound odd. ..voices being planted in their heads, being stalked by a multiplicity of strangers and sometimes, even worse.

However, a review of what is declassified in terms of covert projects reveals a number of operations involving attempts to control or direct human thought, and by consequence therefore to mold behavior. Project Artichoke was one of the subjects of scrutiny in the Church and Pike Committee hearings, which took place in the US Senate and the House of Representatives, respectively, during the seventies. A declassified 1952 memo indicates the aim and scope of Artichoke. The memo states “Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self-preservation?”

The Church and Pike hearings uncovered a multiplicity of “black” projects aimed at accessing the human mind. The surviving records concerning Project Artichoke detail forced drugging, including forced morphine addiction and dosing subjects with LSD, in order to determine vulnerabilities to direction and control under the influence. According to released documents, Artichoke was renamed MKULTRA in 1953.

The US Supreme Court has stated that MKULTRA was concerned with “the research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior.”

The Church Committee’s investigation was hampered by an order from CIA Director Richard Helms to destroy the records relating to MKULTRA. As a result of the Church and Pike Committee hearings, MKULTRA and related projects were reportedly terminated.

It is the contention of Julianne McKinney–who was an intelligence case officer with the US Army –and scores of others that the projects only went underground, in order to escape further detection and oversight.

Preston Bailey, PhD has noted the following patents for neurological weapons which could produce the sorts of effects claimed by TIs:

THE NEUROPHONE: US Patent # 3,393,279. July 16th, 1968 –a device which converts sound to electrical impulses.

SILENT SUBLIMINAL PRESENTATION SYSTEM: US Patent #5,159,703. October 27th, 1992 — A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low or very high audio frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude or frequency modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain.

HEARING SYSTEM: U.S. patent #4,877,027, 31/10/89—“Sound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particular waveform.”

HEARING DEVICE: U.S patent #4,858,612, 22/8/89—“A method and apparatus for simulation of hearing in mammals by introduction of a plurality of microwaves into the region of the auditory cortex is shown and described.”

A further review of the literature uncovers dozens more such patents, including the following:


Non-ConSensual Chemical Weapons Testing

Not all the current torture allegations involve electromagnetic weapons, however. The Edgewood Test Vets lawsuit charged that the US Army tested a variety of chemical and biological weapons on soldiers, without gaining their informed consent, from the 1950s on into “at least 1976.”

According to the plaintiffs, “In this class action, the Plaintiff class seeks declaratory and injunctive relief only – no monetary damages – and redress for several decades of the U.S. Government’s use of them as human test subjects in chemical and biological agent testing experiments, followed by decades of neglect, including:

  • the use of troops to test nerve gas, psychochemicals, and hundreds of other toxic chemical or biological substances;
  • the failure to satisfy their legal obligations to locate the participants of experiments and to provide them with notice of what they were exposed to and what the possible health effects may be;
  • the failure to follow their legal obligations to provide medical care to test subjects for health problems related to the experiments;
  • the failure to release the test subjects from oaths of secrecy.”

According to multiple claims, such non-consensual experimentation is now regularly carried out on citizens. Some of the individuals claiming “torture without borders” have intelligence backgrounds. Geral Sosbee is a former FBI agent whose career with the agency apparently went sour when he objected to an arrest. He subsequently resigned from the FBI and went on to work as an attorney in El Paso, Texas and as a part time judge. He also taught at the University level. However, Sosbee states that the Agency’s vendetta against him became relentless.

Writes Sosbee: “….no attention is focused on psychological operations against a targeted person even though a growing number of persons worldwide now testify that they are targeted by ruthless and painful campaigns. No law exists that may stop the type of violent activities in which the FBI and the CIA engage regularly against their Targets, foreign and domestic.”

Sosbee has diligently and quite publicly documented his ordeal. A 2009 entry on his website.In the introduction to his report, Sosbee has detailed an extensive list of methods to torture a target, including not only electromagnetics but also other unconventional weapons. He cites repeated instances of poisonings, some apparently life threatening.

Intelligence agencies have long been known to use poisons against foreign spies. What is of note is that poisons are now apparently being used against domestic US targets.

Sosbee is not alone in his claims of chemical targeting.

Carol Warner is the daughter of former CIA General Counsel, John Warner, who was also pivotal in creating the CIA out of OSS back in the forties. Carol received a Masters Degree in Clinical Social Work from Smith College. She was working as a therapist when a woman walked into her office claiming that she had been groomed by the US government as a “presidential model” sex slave. This contact launched an avalanche in Warner’s life. In a book pending publication, Warner writes: “Sometime after I started training and working more intensively with dissociative identity disorder, I began to be aware I was under intense surveillance.” (Return to the Self, p. 135)

During the Church Committee hearings in the seventies, her father, John Warner, initially became aware of some of the CIA “black ops” programs involving mind control. In her book, Carol Warner recounts some of the discussions she had with her father at that time and comments on the impact of the destruction of MKULTRA records by Director Richard Helms. She writes: “As such, it was abundantly clear to my father and myself back then that the programs would not stop, because Congress never knew about most of them.”

Carol Warner’s soon-to-be-published book, Return to the Self, covers a wide range of issues, including ritual abuse, dreams, spirituality and a discussion of government involvement in mind altering programs. In disclosing her decision to go public about her own situation, Warner tells us that “I was not going to write about this and the many illegal and unconstitutional activities perpetrated against me since 2008, but circumstances have forced me to revise my decision. Unfortunately, as this near-fatal incident (which I will describe later) dramatically proved to me, there is no safety for me in keeping the knowledge I have gained to myself. I have been told by wise counsel that my only safety is in getting the information out. Unfortunately, it has become radically clear the powers that be do not want the information in this book out.” (Return to the Self, p. 134)

She then reveals a number of incidents in Virginia in which her house was illegally entered, one in which her alarm wiring was altered and also where she was followed and stalked. She also describes a number of murder attempts. An avid outdoorswoman, Warner reveals how she was hiking when she became aware she had been followed into a secluded area. Attempting to elude her stalker, she writes: “I kept walking, headed there with my sole focus on finding a good temporary hiding place. Then, out of nowhere, I felt a sting in my right butt cheek. To my utter dismay, I felt myself starting to lose consciousness. Whatever it was that had stung me was powerful and was quickly overtaking me. There was no doubt in my mind that I had been drugged. (CIA development of tranquilizer dart guns became public knowledge with the Church Committee investigation in the 1970s). In a flash I assessed my predicament. Succumbing to the drug was not an option—it would mean certain death.”

Warner was able to marshal her strength to survive this incident; however, the efforts against her did not stop. Other stalking incidents reveal that her movements were being monitored, as her stalkers chose to advance against her in various locations with potentially life threatening results.

Warner also reports the use of chemical agents. She details the following event, while eating out: “The soup tasted off, and I didn’t eat but a few bites of it. I started feeling horrible immediately, with gastrointestinal symptoms. I felt dizzy and fought to keep consciousness… …I didn’t make it but a few steps. When I came to, I was lying on the restaurant floor, surrounded by paramedics.”

The doctor’s verdict was chemical—not food—poisoning.

Why Torture People at All?

Torture is not a reliable method to gain confessions. Truth serum drugs obviate the necessity for using torture to gain information. In this perspective, the repeated claims by governments that torture is necessary for reasons of intelligence gathering are inadequate to explain torture as an interrogatory tool.

However, torture does desensitize and condition the perpetrator. According to McKinney, somewhere in the ball park of 15-20% of US citizens may be involved —at some level—in using others as target practice. The degradation of society and morality implicit here should not go unnoticed.

In a recent interview, McKinney stated that targets are chosen somewhat at random, although she also believes that these torture techniques are being deployed against specific individuals for retaliation. In her 1992 paper, McKinney stated that “…harassment is beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who try to assist electronic ‘harassees.’ Retaliation suggests loss of control. Under the circumstances, we are not entirely confident that ‘whistleblowers’ will continue to be exempted from this type of harassment in the long term.”

McKinney now believes that these techniques have resulted in deaths. In response to the question why—why would intelligence agencies use these “torture without borders” technologies on US citizens, McKinney stated that she believes that these are training exercises to prepare the perpetrators for a coming holocaust-level event. Rather than controlling the minds of the subjects, which is a common misperception, McKinney stated that the perpetrators are being desensitized and prepared for participation in a more widespread and devastating scenario.

Her conclusions may be echoed by Carol Warner, who wrote that “If people don’t understand the surveillance state is turned on the American citizen, I hope and pray my words will help the reader reconsider. The goal is total full-spectrum control of the populace.”

Janet C. Phelan, investigative journalist and human rights defender that has traveled pretty extensively over the Asian region, an author of a tell-all book EXILE, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.

Cultocracy note :

The above article relates to the U.S. although these methods are being increasingly used on a wide scale in most Western societies including the UK .

An interesting observation from the above article is that the subjects of state sponsored torture are not the actual issue , it is the perpetrators who are actually the main focus . The objective being to condition the perpetrator to perform more extreme acts of degeneracy & cruelty to fulfill the wishes of their controllers .


UK STASI ‘operatives’

Related :

  2. Sadistic Nature OR Self destructive personality
  3. Understanding the Sadistic Personality
  4. Everyday Sadists Take Pleasure In Others’ Pain
  5. Sadistic Personality Disorder
  6. Paraphilia
Posted in Mind Control, Psychotronic Warfare, State Surveillance & Control, Targeted Individuals | Leave a comment

My Beautiful Laundrette

‘My name’s Jim and I sell washing machines’

Cultocracy note :

More embarrassing & predictable hypocrisy from our elected puppets . Vaz was the chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee whose recent inquiries have focused on drugs & asylum . The predilections of Vaz have been widely known for years , most of our UK politicians are controlled in one way or another , they build ’em up & knock ’em down .

The full story :

Keith Vaz stands down as Home Affairs Select Committee chairman after male prostitute claims

Related :

  1. Bercow knew Vaz was under investigation
  2. Home Affairs Select Committee
  3. Keith Vaz helped kill a 90s probe into the Greville Janner
  4. Keith Vaz condemns ‘cowardly’ attack on Jenner
Posted in State Corruption, Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Cultocracy note :

As the author of the video states ‘worse than the Nazi’s ever were’ .

The system is controlled primarily by rogue elements within the N.S.A & C.I.A . The technology is ‘subcontracted’ to other cult controlled elements embedded within the security structure of other ‘friendly’ countries including the UK . The whole system is kept intact by blackmail , intimidation & assassination . The controllers & operators are driven insane by virtue of the power they assume to have at their fingertips . They have opted out of humanity & perceive themselves as ‘gods’ , empire building along with the inevitable death & destruction is the drug they crave .

Full spectrum dominance is the hidden agenda , fabricated instability such as the ‘war on terror’ provides the pretext for this technology to be introduced to societies on a broad scale . Imperial hubris will eventually see the downfall & elimination of the megalomaniac controllers & their collaborators . Evil will always consume itself .
As usual the keyword is control .

Published on Jul 11, 2016

A computer multiplexer routes the signal to a tower satellite or mobile platform and the tower satellite or mobile platform relays the signal to the Digital Reciever similar to how cell phone technology works.

The Digital Reciever is tracked and pinpointed in real time just like a cell phone as this technology is based on timing and location, except with mind control technologies the digital receiver is not a phone. It is a human brain.

The brain of the mind control victim has been digitalized by the nanotechnology, implants, etc. ,in the body blood stream and brain of the mind control victim.

The nanotechnology speaks to and decodes the neurotransmitters in the victims brain allowing the CIA DIA Hive Mind Teams hiding behind law enforcement agencies to turn the brain of the mind control victim into their very own visual verbal and auditive communications system after they have built a cognitive model of the victims brain which they achieve by constantly inflicting physical and psychological trauma on the victim to map out the sensory and neural pathways of the mind control victims brain and central nervous system.

Only the mind control victim absorbs the energy or feels its effects because only the mind control victim possesses that specific brainwave signature that the stream of electromagnetic low frequency waves – containing a hidden carrier frequency specifically tuned to the unique brain wave pattern of the mind control victim – is specifically tuned into.

Others around the victim do not absorb the energy or feel its effects because they do not possess that same unique brainwave signature. The stream of energy just flows through and around them and they are unaware, sort of like placing two cell phones on a table next to each other and then dialing a specific number. Only one phone rings because only that phone possesses that specific residence frequency for that number.

Posted July 11th 2016 1755 hrs Chiang Mai Thailand Baan Klieng Vang Hotel

Posted in Mind Control, Psychotronic Warfare, State Surveillance & Control, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Targeted Individuals XVI: Hyper Game Theory

Related :

  1. Hypergame Theory
  2. Are you targeted?
  4. Psychotronic Torture & Control – An Introduction
Posted in Mind Control, Psychotronic Warfare, Targeted Individuals, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The H.A.A.R.P gets tuned

A report in the New Scientist states that the US Air Force intends to send an array of tiny satellites into orbit , these will release plasma into the ionosphere to increase the range & accuracy of ‘communications’ systems . Ground based H.A.A.R.P grids currently send an electromagnetic beam into the upper atmosphere which is reflected back to earth , this is only effective during the night as the ionosphere is much denser . This proposed satellite system will ‘seed’ the ionosphere with charged particles allowing H.A.A.R.P to operate more efficiently during the day . The full article here at the New Scientist .


A harmless weather station

H.A.A.R.P facilities are sited strategically across the globe , including this suspicious looking  at Capel Dewi , Carmarthenshire , Wales . This site is officially listed as a ‘radar facility’ , it is run by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) . NERC describes the facility as an ‘atmospheric observatory’ that is the ‘UK’s most powerful and most versatile wind-profiling instrument’ , basically an expensive weather station , which may be true , or not .

Many observers cite this type of facility as being the real cause of global warming , mind control & erratic weather conditions including earth quakes , which may be true , or not .

Related :


  1. H.A.A.R.P locations
  2. H.A.A.R.P in New Zealand
  3. H.A.A.R.P in Australia
  4. H.A.A.R.P in Canada
  5. H.A.A.R.P in U.S.A
  7. Did UK HAARP facility cause 3.8 earthquake in Wales


Also related :


  1. ECHELON Today: The Evolution of an NSA Black Program
  3. “Five Eyes” Global Spying & Deep State
  5. Five Eyes & Multi Beam Antenna Systems
  6. NSA Maintains Secret “Five Eyes” Satellite Facility in Israel



More related articles :


  1. Microwave Mind Control Symptoms & Published Evidence
  2. Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts? (i) (PDF)
  3. Can a satellite read your thoughts ? (ii)
  4. Remote Neural Monitoring: How They Spy on Your Thoughts
  5. Understanding The Brainwashing Program
  6. You are not my Big Brother

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our freedoms are gone & the only freedom left is our mind

By Cultocracy

A review of the UK governments flagship investigatory powers bill was yesterday brushed aside by the loaded panel . This was predictable to say the least , the bill has been years in the making & was bulldozed through parliament by the security services which now run the country in a style similar to tin pot African dictatorships & former Eastern Block totalitarian regimes . The bill was announced in the Queen’s speech last year & was passed by parliament in June this year . The review was a token gesture intended to placate civil liberties groups , the only people who seem to be interested in preserving the last vestiges of individual freedom left .

The review panel , just like the Tory government was controlled by the security services . David Anderson QC the chair has been a staunch supporter of the bill since it’s inception , out of Anderson’s three advisers two were former employees of the state security apparatus , Robert Nowill was GCHQ’s former Director of Technology and Engineering , Gordon Meldrum was the former Director of Intelligence for the National Crime Agency . All along the bill has been promoted & marketed with the usual rhetoric involving protecting the public against terrorists & paedophiles . The only glimmer of hope is that the new laws will also target the terrorists & paedophiles infesting the upper reaches of the political & security establishments , although this is unlikely as recent history has shown .

What is included in the bill ?

The bill allows the security services to hoover up any data on a massive scale , not just domestically but globally , it also allows them to hack into any network . The information to be collected & stored includes all of your personal details held on any database anywhere in the world , personal datasets , details & recordings of telephone & internet use , basically everything . Of course they have been doing this for years , the bill simply cements this into law thus covering their backs if any concerned citizen dares to complain .

What are the powers actually for ?

The information gleaned will be used for social control & conditioning , straight out of the Tavistock Institute , knowledge is power . Any group or individual who is not ‘on message’ will be targeted & pressured to fall into line with the current mode of thought , any form of dissent or free thinking will become a virtual criminal offence . As usual control is the keyword . Apart from social control the data can be used for financial gain , companies will have no secrets , technological advances will automatically by default become the property of the security apparatus & the military industrial complex , their controllers will decide how best to use the knowledge . They can then twist & subvert the knowledge to further consolidate the established power structure . Private corporations & wealthy individuals across the globe will be able to tap into this data , obviously at a cost to themselves in both personal & financial terms .

Where will this lead ?

The investigatory powers bill  will provide the foundations for total population control or Full Spectrum Dominance in military terms . The UK is now a de-facto cultocracy , the Crown controls the military , the Crown is a corporation sole , not the country . Many individuals within this faction of the establishment would prefer to rule using an outdated feudal system , the UK population becoming subservient serfs & slaves, they do not trust regular people to govern . This faction also has vested interests to protect , primarily financial interests & land ownership . Democracy & government by the people for the people is slipping away . Politics has been reduced to farcical theatrics , a controllable two party system , this will slowly become a one party system . Red team or Blue team it does not matter , it is a false construct preserving the illusion of choice .

Incidentally all of the surveillance bills being forced onto the UK population & similar powers instigated in the US were a direct result of the fabricated ‘War on Terror’ . Makes you think .

Our freedoms are gone & the only freedom left is our mind – for now .

Related :

  1. ‘Trust us’ isn’t enough
  3. NHS patient data to be made available for sale to drug and insurance firms
  4. HMRC to sell taxpayers’ financial data
  5. MPs to investigate police use of Ripa powers to snoop on journalists
  6. Government forced to release secret policies on surveillance of lawyers
  7. How your innocent smartphone passes on almost your entire life to the secret service
  8. UK Home Sec wants Minority Report-style policing
  9. Maths spying: The quandary of working for the spooks

Also related :

  1. The Queen’s Speech – Spot the Trojan Horse
  2. The Queen’s Speech – Trojan Horse #1
  3. Investigatory Powers Bill
  4. Labour backs Tory Spy Law
  5. GCHQ’s data-mining techniques revealed in new Snowden leak
  6. Operational case for Bulk Powers (PDF)
Posted in State Surveillance & Control, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Not in Our Bread


Related :

  1. The Real Reason Wheat is Toxic (it’s not the gluten)
  2. Maybe You Aren’t Actually Gluten Intolerant. Maybe You’re Just Poison Intolerant
  3. Poisonous herbicide is invading the food chain
  4. Glyphosate causes cancer and birth defects (PDF)
  5. Widely used herbicide linked to cancer
  6. Research Links Roundup (Glyphosate) to Gluten Disorder Epidemic & Cancer
  7. Not in Our Bread
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment